|
|
Post by Ryan Anthony on Aug 13, 2012 21:15:20 GMT -5
Does Sting deserve to be in the WWE Hall of Fame?
I realize he only wrestled one match in the WWE, [the final match of WCW Nitro was Flair vs. Sting, and that was a WWE produced show], however, you also have to consider the fact that WWE now owns WCW, and all the history that comes with it.
Thoughts?
|
|
Kevin
Junior Member
I am a gigantic toolbox.
Posts: 93
|
Post by Kevin on Aug 14, 2012 4:27:26 GMT -5
I think he deserves the invitation, whether he accepts is the only problem I see with it.
|
|
JoeFTWpodcast
New Member
Talking Head of the FTW Podcast
Posts: 28
|
Post by JoeFTWpodcast on Aug 14, 2012 10:44:46 GMT -5
He deserves it as WCW was merged into WWE, but not till he's done in TNA.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt Ouellette on Aug 18, 2012 12:25:19 GMT -5
I'm sure he'll be in if he accepts the invitation. I could go either way. If he's never in I won't care as much like I do with Randy Savage or someone more deserving who actually worked for WWE.
|
|
Sargon
New Member
Jon Hein never masturbates
Posts: 15
|
Post by Sargon on Aug 28, 2012 11:48:51 GMT -5
I think the WWE has got to extend the invitation. It's an 'obligation' that came with buying the company - taking care and looking out for the former promotion's talent and legacy. It'll also only help to continue to build the WWE's legacy.
And all that said -- I think they'll do it. Ron Simmons got inducted this year and I'd argue his best days were the late 80's and early 90's of WCW (when he became the first african-american heavyweight champion). This tells me the WWE is willing to 'accept' this obligation of enshrining historically appropriate WCW/NWA entertainers.
|
|
